Improv and Scripted Theater

I went to see Oliver Twist at the Berkeley Rep last week. It was a great show in spite of the odd choice to cast Oliver with an adult actor (a young adult, pictured above in white, but still an adult and as tall as Fagan) speaking in an affected high-pitched voice of a 10 year old. I won’t go into all the reasons THAT didn’t work, but suffice it to say the show overcame that fault to be highly enjoyable. The rest of the cast was brilliant especially the actor in the Dodger/Narrator role, Carson Elrod (an improvisor, no less, pictured above in the top hat, who was on the TV version of Keith Johnstone's Lifegame).
The show was done as a melodrama with a lot monologues and lines directed outward to the audience, but what struck me as an improvisor were two moments in particular. In both instances the actors not only directed their lines towards the audience, but asked the audience direct questions. However, both moments were designed to rely on the fact that no one in the audience would actually respond to the actor. In fact, the only way for those moments to work at all were if the audience did not respond. Had someone responded, the action wouldn’t have been able to move forward as was required for the narrative (a character would have known something they needed to not know) or the joke quite simply wouldn’t have worked.
How sad is that? Not only did they not expect the audience to respond to being directly addressed, but they were counting on it for effect. What’s wrong with modern drama that a non-reactive audience is taken for granted?
As an improvisor, used to directly engaging the audience, I was prepared to shout out responses to the actor’s direct queries, but I held back because I could tell from context that they didn’t really want a response. I’m sure that was not the reason holding most other audience members back.
There’s just something wrong with that.
Labels: improv




